标签：Use based col2 use lists col1 anonymous type types

Use anonymous type for LINQ based lists instead of var

问题

I've LINQ requests that return anonymous types like:

var result = context.Table1.Select(
    x => new
    {
        col1 = x.col1,
        col2 = x.col2
    }).ToList();

That works fine, until I want to hand over the result to another function.

Than I need to specify exactly, what's type the list is. I cannot use var anymore.

But if I use

List< (string col1, string col2)> result ...

I get an "Cannot implicitly convert type ..." error.

Yes, I can create a new class for each entity. But is this the only way to handle it?

回答1

If you want to use a tuple type (that's what your (string col1, string col2) is) instead of an anonymous type (that's what your new { col1=x.col1...} is), you need another syntax:

List<(string col1, string col2)> list = context.Table1
    .Select( // linq to entities
    x => new
    {
        col1 = x.col1,
        col2 = x.col2
    })
    .ToArray() // go on with linq to objects for use of tuple types
    .Select(x => (col1: x.col1, col2: x.col2))
    .ToList();

ValueTuples aren't supported in Expression trees, so you might need to use a combination of anonymous types and tuple types in your query

See Tuple types, Choosing between anonymous and tuple types

标签：Use,based,col2,use,lists,col1,anonymous,type,types
来源： https://www.cnblogs.com/chucklu/p/16469088.html

本站声明： 1. iCode9 技术分享网（下文简称本站）提供的所有内容，仅供技术学习、探讨和分享；
2. 关于本站的所有留言、评论、转载及引用，纯属内容发起人的个人观点，与本站观点和立场无关；
3. 关于本站的所有言论和文字，纯属内容发起人的个人观点，与本站观点和立场无关；
4. 本站文章均是网友提供，不完全保证技术分享内容的完整性、准确性、时效性、风险性和版权归属；如您发现该文章侵犯了您的权益，可联系我们第一时间进行删除；
5. 本站为非盈利性的个人网站，所有内容不会用来进行牟利，也不会利用任何形式的广告来间接获益，纯粹是为了广大技术爱好者提供技术内容和技术思想的分享性交流网站。